As a public law library, a lot of our questions come from the general public (frequently looking for legal advice, which we cannot give.) Many of these questions come in through our askalibrarian e-mail service. Sometimes people find the link on the court’s Web page or find our page (often our FAQ page) through a Google search. We had a question just the other day from out-of-state by a person who had found our information and hoped we could help her find similar information for her own state. So, in some ways Google is increasing our business.
The useful thing about these answer sites is the possibility of finding answers to questions that may not be in reference books. One can hope for a specialist in—or someone with personal knowledge of—your obscure subject to just happen by. Don’t know how often that would really happen. I was not overly impressed with a lot of the answers I did see. This makes Slam the Boards a great marketing opportunity for librarians.
There are specialized online answer sites for law. Just glancing through the answers to legal questions on some of the sites listed in this Thing, I think people would be better served by a dedicated law answer site such as
FreeAdvice.com. The answers there are more likely to be posted by attorneys who will be able to give the proper caveats with their answer. (The answer to most quick questions for legal advice is “it depends.”)
David Lee King’s article was interesting. Most of the policies he mentions were probably written when libraries were just starting to offer e-mail service and didn’t know what to expect from it. At our library, e-mail questions are answered by the person on the desk. Very rarely do any have to be passed on to the next desk shift, even though people visiting in person or calling on the phone get priority. Did we know this would balance out so smoothly when we started? No. The idea of warning people that there might be a delay in answering their e-mail is now archaic.
E-mail has advantages over telephone reference. E-mail gives you time to put together a more thoughtful and in-depth response without having to break the transaction by taking a phone number and calling the person back. It is also much easier to refer someone to a Web resource (such as our FAQ page) in an e-mail than over the phone. Of course, it is harder to do a reference interview with e-mail. (We haven’t started any kind of chat reference yet.)